Mental wanderings 1

When I first started writing posts for this blog, I think it was meant more to help myself than to try and spread any kind of message. Don't get me wrong, if I can help single men STAY single and never make the same mistake I did (marriage), I will be very happy. If I knew that I managed to save even ONE, I'd consider this thing a 'success'.

But as time has gone on, I've thought that maybe my talent would best be spent in a different direction. If I write about all the failings of women, all their evil, all the reasons to avoid them, I'm just another voice in the crowd, and not a very good one at that. I don't have the knowledge that a lot of other writers have, mostly because a) I just discovered the truth earlier this year, and b) I don't read and study as much as they do.

I'll admit, I've gotten pretty lazy about my reading this year. I used to go through books like mad. Mostly fiction, yes, but not all. And my basic criteria for reading is, if I'm not enjoying the material, I don't finish it. In high school I think I made it through about 20 pages of "The Scarlet Letter" (and that only because I thought that I didn't want to cheat on quizzes right away). I didn't even make it that far in a book that Psycho Hellbitch had, called "Seraphim" or something like that. MAYBE 8 pages. Maybe. I've gotten a little better this month; I've already finished The Clone Redemption and I borrowed a book of Kipling's verses from the library. I'm not far into that yet, though, since I wanted to finish the other book first.

And yes, when I have free time I'd rather go to the gym, or goof off on the web, or play video games, or play guitar, or go fishing, or go shooting....seems like I always have something I want to do. Even at night, I'm doing something else, and next thing I know it's time to go to bed. And I never get around to picking up the dozen or so books I've bought or received as gifts in the past year.

So I can't explain all the science, psychology, whatever, behind why women are the terrible monsters that they are. All I'd be doing is repeating what someone else said, and really, what's the point of that? I'd be better off providing links to other people's writing, people who've said it far better than I can.

There is something that I can do, though. And considering my past, it's fitting.

I can lead by example.

I tell you about my activities, I can show you the things that I do. Things that no female can compete with.

My life is almost completely stress-free. Other than concern over finances, I've got pretty much no stress. And even the finances isn't that big of a deal, especially now since everything is sorted (or as sorted as it's going to get for a while, anyway). Bills are taken care of, work is great, I do what I want, when I want.

I've had a lot of free time lately, so I've been going to the gym, shooting pool with a couple of my brothers, and playing video games or working on my (very limited) guitar skills. I'd like to fish more but it's been damned cold, and I don't ice fish. I have some pictures of some of the places I've fished recently, as well as just random things I thought I might share with whoever is reading this, which I will try to remember to post here soon.

I think this weekend might be a good weekend to do some shooting. My youngest brother has been wanting to go, and now that hunting season is over I don't have to worry about some .gov goon game warden trying to steal my rifles by saying that I'm poaching deer.

I've changed my workout up some, following advice from a friend of mine who's a big-time workout guy, as well as some videos I've found on YouTube. If you have any neat advice, or know of a video that you've gotten good results from, feel free to add them in the comments.

My goal this week is to do something other than just go to the gym and play video games or read. I'll let you know how that works out.

Today is a rest day, so I'm going to go back to the goofing off that is my plan for today.

I obviously don't know what it's like where you live, but where I am, it's still below zero on the Fahrenheit scale. And I think it's going to be like this for another week.

Stay warm and single, my friends.

Still alive and kicking

Yes, it's been a while since I've written anything here. I haven't felt the urge. Been too busy doing other things (besides just work, which is going great, I might add). Grand Theft Auto 5...yes. Working out....yes. Fishing....YES! Even got to do a little bit of shooting recently.

I went to verify that my scope was on-target on the rifle that I intend to use for hunting this year. Good thing I did, because it wasn't. I also took my M1 Garand with me, since I haven't put any rounds through that in a while. It was a great day for it, too. Sunny, slight breeze, enough warmth that a sweatshirt would be plenty of clothing. So here I am, trekking about with a loaded Garand in my hands and a .308 on my back, on my way back to where I had intended to shoot after talking to someone else I saw out there to make sure we weren't going to endanger or interfere with each other...and I just happen to stop and look to my right, must've caught something out of the corner of my eye. And maybe 50 meters away are 4 whitetail does. Just staring at me. I felt the rifle keenly, and I thought to myself how easy it would be (if the barrel wasn't basically shot-out on the M1...) to shoot them all and get the meat in the freezer. However, the season hadn't started yet, and since I don't need the meat to survive or even to get by, poaching them would be wrong. I considered getting my camera out of my backpack, but as soon as I made a slight movement, they started bounding away. I just watched them go, thankful for that one excellent, peaceful moment.

Beautiful fall weather is a very brief thing around here. After the first of September, we could get snow at basically any moment. OK, I take that back...we could get snow at any moment ALL YEAR LONG (we got it on the 4th of July once when I was a kid, and I've had snowball fights in August), it's just a lot more likely after Sept. 1.

The snow has started to fly, and I don't ice fish, so it looks like my fishing may be ended for the year. That's not a sure thing though. Provided the river or lake I want to fish isn't iced over, I'll fish any time of year. Winter just means I can't get in the water. Unfortunate, but I think I'll live.

Hunting season just started, and even though I missed the opening weekend due to flaky people, I still have plenty of time to get a deer. So you know I'm going to be out there doing so. I'd like to get an elk, but elk are pretty much a lost cause if you don't have a horse, thanks to all the never-sufficiently-damned wolves. I'm not going to hike a dozen miles from any dirt road or track, and then drag an elk back that same dozen miles. They're too damn big and heavy. I've got some more working out I need to do yet before I get to that point. Ha!

Speaking of, I've been hitting the gym on a regular basis again, and loving it. Not really keen on the times I've been going, since sleeping in might feel damn great on my days off but it also means there are more people there by the time I get there. Midnight is about the perfect time to go.

So much of what I do with my time off, I wouldn't be able to do if I had some screeching harpy in my life.  My stress level is as close to zero as it can be without me being dead or in a coma.  I go where I want, when I want. I buy what I want with the money that's not going into my savings. And I've got a decent amount saved up, something I never managed to do when I was in a relationshit. I look back on my life and I ask myself, "WHY? WHY in the name of all that is good and holy did you ever bother?" And the only answer I can come up with is, "Ignorance". I didn't know any better. I'd been conditioned to believe something my entire life, and I didn't know any other way. No matter what anyone says, humans don't rise to the occasion; we default to our level of training. And I was trained in the Blue Pill Way. "Trained"....indoctrinated would be more accurate. Brainwashed would be another good word.

I've since had my ignorance remedied, and damn, is life great. Even though it got off to a rocky start, 2013 has been the best year of my life. And I'm betting that 2014 is even better.

I now realize why, when he's asked how he's doing, Rush Limbaugh always says "Never better". Whether you love him or hate him (I have no use for tradcons, personally....even less use for libtards and other assorted Marxist filth), you have to admire his outlook on things. Every day is the best day of his life. EVERY. DAY. Is the best day of his life.

That's awesome.

"Life is great." Three little words, that I never would have uttered when I was married, or even when I was just in a relationshit. Maybe that should be "Single life is great."

Stay single, my friends.

Two Videos I Want to Share With You

Let me just preface this by saying, I generally do NOT like rap. It has become just as much repackaged garbage bullshit as...well, most other lamestream music. Occasionally I'll hear a song I like, but it's pretty damn rare.

On the other hand, maybe rap is similar to metal, industrial, and electronica, in that you have to look to the so-called "underground" to find the good stuff? Before they get big and lamestream.

Well, whatever....here are a couple videos that I want to share. Give them a watch. Yes, I realize the quality could be better. I doubt they were in a multi-million dollar recording studio when they made these songs.


The First One

The second one

For some reason it won't let me embed that one like it did the other one. Keeps saying "No video found".

Enjoy!

Another thing I read that I'd like to share

I don't do as much surfing and reading as a great many of the people who are writing. I've got things I'd rather do, ya know? So a lot of times when I find something, it's because of a link somewhere that I go frequently. Such is the case here.

This is an older piece on The Spearhead, but I think I just now read it. And it's a great bit of writing.

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/01/10/implications-of-the-apex-fallacy/

The Sixth Stage

The Sixth Stage

As anyone who’s studied psychology, even just in a “Let’s read some interesting stuff on the Interwebz” kind of way, most likely already knows, there are five recognized stages of loss and grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. And they’re not necessarily consecutive, nor is each stage a “Once and done” kind of thing. That is to say, it’s possible to go from denial to depression, then to anger, or to drop from acceptance back into depression or anger.

When it comes to Red Pill Knowledge, I theorize the following:

• ·         For many men, bargaining can be left out completely. They realize that there is no way to strike any kind of bargain. You can’t negotiate with hypergamy, or Briffault’s Law, or the Rationalization Hamster. These are concepts, not entities. Trying to bargain with them is like trying to strike a deal with the sun. And forget bargaining with women about ANYTHING. I’m sure any man who’s ever tried that can tell you how it works. You live up to your end, and they do what the hell they want to do, deals be damned.

• ·         Denial tends to be brief once reality is accepted and the Matrix rejected. In my own experience, it lasted maybe 15 minutes from the time I searched Google for “Why are women such stuck-up bitches?”  I couldn’t believe what I was reading, but the more I read, the more EVERYTHING up til that point made sense.

• ·         Anger is the phase most men stick with the longest, and when regression happens it is the stage most commonly regressed TO. This is understandable, in my opinion. You’ve been sold a heaping pile of lies your entire life, conditioned since birth to believe a fantasy and follow a life script that someone else wrote. And since most men unplug due to getting severely mauled by the divorce or false-allegations industries, they are understandably upset. Conditioning that continues for decades and is reinforced by everything around you every day is hard to shake off; a great many things, post-Matrix, serve as reminders of just how large the pile of lies truly is. Even after reaching acceptance, it’s still easy to be angered by further evidence of the truth. Double standards in the so-called “justice” system are one example that comes to mind easily, as is the continued disregard for men when it comes to divorce and child custody.

• ·         Depression is probably the hardest stage to get out of. Why bother, when there’s no point? If everything is a lie, what’s the point of going on? This is the stage that will either destroy a man completely, or show him what he’s capable of. If he doesn’t turn to alcohol or drugs and kill himself slowly, or taste-test a shotgun or pistol and kill himself quickly, he might just come out the other side stronger and better. It’s HARD, so damned hard, to do, but I think most do, simply by virtue of the fact that they’re men, and even though most of society’s conditioning has been thrown off by this point, they still don’t want to be seen as weak, or quitters, or what have you.

• ·         I think there exists a sixth stage (or fifth, if you discount bargaining): apathy. Not everyone reaches apathy, and those that do vary greatly in their level of it. Apathy is, in my opinion, the stage to aspire to. I think it also represents the final point in healing. This doesn’t mean that everything is all better now; rather, there will be no more healing. Anything that is going to scar up has.

I realized recently that I’m apathetic toward almost everything. It’s almost like my outlook on everything has become some variation of “Not My Problem” or “IDGAF (I don’t give a fuck)”. I enjoy my hobbies. I like my job. I hang out with my friends when I have a chance and feel like it (read: when I can stand to be around their females. So basically, not very often). Other than that, there really isn’t much I give a damn about.

I used to. I used to give a damn about a lot of things. I used to care about politics, liberty, the direction this country was going, all kinds of things. Now… I go fishing. I play video games. I read. I work out, or go for a run. I hang out with my brother. I go shooting.

What I DON’T do is give a fuck about much of anything that doesn’t directly impact my life. I’ll still get involved in discussions, especially on the Interwebz, but I think that’s mostly just some kind of mental exercise. When I boil it down to “Is this my problem?”, and the answer is “No”, then I go back to Not Giving a Fuck.

I especially don’t give a fuck when it comes to women. I can’t tell you the last time I even bothered to talk to one outside of work or them taking my order in a restaurant. The last time I saw one of my friends, his twat wouldn’t shut her mouth the entire time him and I were hanging out. I didn’t say one word to her. Didn’t even say hi when he introduced us. I would say it was like she was a yapping dog, but the fact is, I would at least acknowledge a dog. Let it sniff my hand so it can get to know me, maybe pet it a bit to calm it down, or throw a ball or share some beef jerky or something.

 Not so with her. I did ALMOST acknowledge her existence at one point, due to a snarky comment she made that I wanted very badly to respond to, but I was trying to be…eh, let’s go with “not completely fucking hostile”, just for my friend’s sake. Yes, we’ve been friends for 30 years, and consider ourselves brothers, but even most brothers are going to get upset when their brother says something like “Cunt, shut your fucking mouth, the humans are talking. (Insert brother’s name), put a leash and muzzle on your talking animal, or put it in the house, but I don’t want to hear its fucking yap again.” Maybe I’m not as fully into apathy as I thought I was before recalling that, since I didn’t say it out loud at the time. Or maybe I’m just making SOME attempt to not completely alienate my friend. I don’t know. Nor do I care to give it much thought, either.

I find that I don’t get as worked up over stories of men getting screwed by some dumb bitch or the System, or example of the Pussy Pass being issued, or a lot of the other topics you’ll see on one of the forums I frequent, as I used to. In fact, a lot of times I will look at the title, say IDGAF, and scroll right on by.

I don’t care to watch the news, or read the newspaper or news websites. It’s unimportant; IDGAF.

I just want to fish, work out, go shooting, and all of the rest of my hobbies and time-killers.

Life is so much more rewarding and stress-free now that I’ve accepted apathy. It’s like the line in the book/movie, “Fight Club”: “Only when we’ve lost everything are we free to do ANYthing.”  But with its own special twist. Only when we stop caring about everything are we free to enjoy ANYthing.

And enjoy I most certainly do. I’m enjoying the HELL out of life.

And I hope you are too.

To close this out, I’d like to share a video that I think is fucking hilarious:

Enjoy life, my friends!

Understanding is not Treason

Yes, I haven't been writing much lately. Work has me all over the place, and I've been spending more time fishing, hanging out with several of my siblings, going to the lakes and rivers, that kind of thing. You know, LIVING. :)

So anyway, the only female I work with told one of the other guys, who then repeated it to me, that I "think I'm some kind of Ladies Man".

Dafuk?

Remember the military intelligence guys in World War II that studied the Japanese? They learned their language, learned about their culture, the way they think, all that good stuff. And they broke the codes of the Imperial Japanese Navy. They probably had more to do with us defeating the Japanese Empire than anyone else.

Would you call them traitors, because they studied, knew, and understood the enemy?

That's what I feel like I was called. A traitor. Because I understand the enemy.

I was dragged into a war I didn't want, with someone that I didn't consider (at the time) to be my enemy. Once I realized a war was on, I went guerrilla. And I've been studying my enemy, learning how they think.

Learning the best ways to hurt them and live to fight another day.

I don't consider myself a pimp, player, PUA, Ladies Man, or whatever your description of choice is. I've gone out with ONE woman since the beginning of April, and that ended up not going anywhere because I called the hamster on its bullshit. And I'm fine with that.

I don't think I'm the gods' gift to women. I know I'm not a hideous troll, but obviously I'm not in the Top 5% of men that women will bother with before they enter Wallet-Seeking Mode, either. And I'm fine with that.

I know there's a good chance she was playing and being her usual smartass self (she's one of maybe a handful of women I've worked with that was actually enjoyable to work with), but still....for some reason that comment kinda bothers me.

I'm not a traitor, and that's what I feel like I was called.

In more important news, I really need to put my other fishing pole in my car. The rig I have setup for catching pike isn't doing so well with trout in the rivers and lakes I've been fishing. The line is too heavy for the lures that I have. My other rod has lighter line, this will work much better.

I caught a pathetically small lake trout yesterday. Too big to use as bait, too small to take a picture of. So small, the hook on the lure didn't do in his mouth, it caught him under the chin. I'm guessing he was trying to eat the colored part of the spinner and got too close to the hook.

I'll pick up my other pole this weekend. As well as do some more fishing up around Flathead Lake, and pick wild raspberries and huckleberries (if we can find any) with my sister and nephew.

Next week, the trout will hate me! Haha

I'm NEVER Growing Up

Ok, maybe that should say "I'm NEVER Growing Up AGAIN".

I saw another shaming article recently....ack....OK, I read a topic about a shaming article on a forum I frequent. I can't be bothered to actually read the drivel that femimarxists write, especially the shaming bullshit.

ANYWAY, the person who posted it was nice enough to include a list, from said article, about the top 30 male maturity failings. This is according to women, of course, so you know it's not worth the electrons it took to make the words on the computer.

A few things that I really enjoy are on this idiotic list. Coming in at Number 3, Playing video games.

Cupcake doesn't like a man to have ANYTHING he enjoys that doesn't equal devoting ALL of his time, energy, and money to her. So of course women HATE video games and porn.

Reading the topic about this sub-moronic article reminded me I've been meaning to buy a couple more games. I decided not to get Twisted Metal, and instead go with Hitman: Absolution. Also bought Rocksmith, because I want to learn how to play the guitar. Maybe I'll discover that I do actually have some musical talent or ability buried deep within me.

I enjoy video games. A lot. Good ones, anyway. I don't play Children's Online Daycare. My friends do, and they've tried to get me to buy an Xbox and COD so that we can play together. Meh, no thanks. I'll stick with Battlefield.

The river is finally starting to go down a little bit. It's not quite as high, fast, and choked with logs and branches as it was last week. So maybe I'll be able to go fishing again pretty soon.

I'm also getting a stereo put in my car this week. The factory deck has served its purpose but it's time for it to go. At some point I'll get the damage that Psycho Hellbitch inflicted to the car repaired so the trunk doesn't leak, and replace the sub that she stole.

I may also buy another .45 pretty soon. I saw a Kimber 1911 that I really liked in a sporting goods store. I'll get at least somewhat caught up on a few more bills and then snag a nice new 1911.

I guess I'm one of those "Peter Pan Men", I need to "Grow up", since I spend my paychecks paying bills and buying the things that I want, rather than wifing up some used-up party girl whore with 3 wombturds and letting her have the entirety of my time and money.

I'm happy to not be 'grown up'. Life is good, and I'm happy.

I hope you all are too. Spend as much time as possible on the things you enjoy. Have a great day.

Nacho speaks!

Nacho Vidal, of MGTOW Forums fame, now has a YouTube channel.

Props, Nacho. Maybe someday I'll join you. Maybe.

Anyway, here are the videos up thus far:

An Audience with Nacho Vidal, Admin of MGTOW Forums, Part 1
An Audience with Nacho Vidal, Admin of MGTOW Forums, Part 2

WoolyBumbleBee Gets Canned.....GOOD!

A big thank you to CA at This is Why MGTOW for his helpful timeline. Saved me something like 6 minutes of my life!

Let me preface this by saying, I don't go to AVfM. My exposure to it is from conversations on MGTOW Forums. I most likely will never go to AVfM; if I do it will be to read something that was linked somewhere else and whoever posted the link was too lazy to post the entire thing. AVfM not only let's women join, they let them take positions like editor and such. Uh, no. Women have NO place in any kind of men's movement. None. At all. The vast majority of those currently 'involved' only do so because their son or grandson got fucked over, or because they are second wives and any money going into vagimony is money that THEY are not managing to loot from their sucker husband. The ATM doesn't spit out as much cash when someone else is getting a cut of all money placed into it.

So some of you are probably aware of the situation with this 'WoolyBumbleBee'. If you're not, just watch her videos on YouTube where she basically tries to shame the fuck outta MGTOW.

Oh, by the way: stop pronouncing it Mig-Tao, scumpouch. Christ on a fucking crutch, do you call the FBI the "FffBeeeEee"? No? Then don't turn this acronym into a word. Just. Fucking. Don't.

Well, apparently she opened her femimarxist mouth one time too many (Yes, I think it's likely she's some kind of plant....listen to the video, she manages to pull just about every femimarxist/female 'card' there is) , and pissed off enough people that Paul told her to take a flying fuck at a rolling hotdog.

Their conversation can be found here. (Yes, it's a link to This Is Why....read some more of his stuff while you're there, OK?)

Good on ya, Paul. We may not do not agree about a few very key things, but I give credit where due, and you earned it. You let the call go on FAR too long, but then, if you hadn't I also wouldn't have gotten all the lulz that I got from listening to her end of it.

Here's to the sacking of Wooly:

I'll raise a few of these this weekend to celebrate:

Mutual Assured Destruction, Femimarxists, Guerrilla Warfare, and MGTOW

I've mentioned before that I'm interested in history, especially military history. There are a lot of great lessons to be learned.

I'm not really sure why the idea for this topic popped into my head. Must've been something I read on a forum.

Anyway....by now you're probably wondering what Mutual Assured Destruction and guerrilla warfare have to do with femimarxists, MGTOW, Gender War, etc. I'm going to let my mind just kind of wander and sort itself out as I'm writing this. The idea is there, it's just not completely solidified yet. But I don't want to take the chance of losing it, so here goes, and I'll (hopefully) fix any problems, inconsistencies, etc., as I'm writing.

Now then, Mutual Assured Destruction:


From Wikipedia:

Mutual assured destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would effectively result in the complete, utter and irrevocable annihilation of both the attacker and the defender,^[1] becoming thus a war that has no victory nor any armistice but only effective reciprocal destruction. It is based on the theory of deterrence according to which the deployment, and implicit menace of use, of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use of the same weapons by the enemy against oneself. The strategy is effectively a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed, has any rational incentive either to initiate a conflict or to disarm (presuming neither side considers self-destruction an acceptable outcome).

Xhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destructionX
*****************

As to how this relates to the Gender War, here's how I see it.

The enemy is femimarxists. Their footsoldiers are women and white knight faggots. They control most of the means of communication/media, as well as the courts and legislatures. These are their weapons. And they're  using their forces (soldiers + weapons) against us, obviously. I mean that's what you DO in a war. They have thus far limited themselves to the use of tactical nuclear weapons, such as: domestic violence laws that only punish men even though women are the aggressor in about 50% of domestic disputes; 'no-fault' divorce laws that should read "It's ALWAYS the man's fault" which punish men for being stupid enough to get married in the first place; and the definitions of sexual harassment and rape being basically changed to 'if a woman say you harassed/raped her, then that is enough, you're fukt'.

I really hate the thought of what their theater or strategic weapons are.

What they don't realize is, our weapons may not be quite as in-your-face, nor as violent, nor as traumatizing to the victim, but they're just as real, and arguably MUCH more powerful.

Let's use MGTOW as an example. When a man decides to GHOW, what is the end result? Assuming that men are approximately 49% of the population of the US, for every MGHOW there is one woman who won't get the marriage she claims she wants. If she's somehow not the typical female, and manages to not get knocked up by some thug who dumps her on her ass and leaves her to raise the wombfilth on her own, this means she doesn't get to have a family. So her future consists of sitting in her apartment or house, surrounded by hundreds of pairs of shoes and probably a dozen cats, drowning in debt, eating ice cream, and watching Lifetime and hating men more by the minute.

Whereas the man in this equation lives a MUCH better life than he ever would have had he wifed her up. He'll actually have money instead of being flat-ass broke and under a mountain of debt. He'll have time for his hobbies, rather than having to devote all of his time to some screeching harpy. He can travel when and if he wants, work the job that he wants rather than the one that will ensure that Cupcake has a credit card with a high enough limit, and, if he so chooses, have relationships (esp. the short term kind, preferably of the one-night variety) with as many women as he chooses to associate with. Young, ATTRACTIVE women, rather than post-Wall hags.

Yes, women have done their utmost to punish him for being male. They hate him because they can't BE him, and so they attempt to destroy him. They may not succeed at destroying him personally, but assuming he hasn't had any kids before unplugging from the Matrix, they've destroyed his genetic line. After he's gone, that's it.

He destroyed her dreams, destroyed her chance at happiness, and if we're lucky, destroyed HER genetic line also.

Both sides are destroyed. Mutual assured destruction.

The difference is the road to the destination. His will be a LOT happier than hers.

We won't even get into the cost to society. I may save that for another day. If not, I'm sure there are plenty of places online where you can get into discussions about that very thing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When fighting a larger, better trained, and better equipped force, one tactic that the smaller force uses is guerrilla warfare. There are stages to guerrilla warfare, and I'm working from memory on a military text I read on the subject so bear with me here. I don't have the book at hand right now, and even though I'm almost certain it made the move with me, it's in storage with the rest of my stuff on the other side of the state.

The first stage is basically organization/recruiting, and propaganda. The next is when the guerrillas have enough strength to actually carry out military operations, albeit on a small and sometimes limited basis. This is where you start to see sniping, ambushes, bombings, that kind of thing. After that, the guerrillas make life fucking miserable for the larger force, basically by stepping up the previous stage. At some point, guerrilla conflicts eventually evolve into conventional conflicts.

It's not necessary for EVERY stage to be hit, and it's entirely possible to go from stage four back to stage 2 (a terrible defeat in a conventional battle could bring this about, for instance).

One of the things that really stuck with me when learning about guerrilla warfare was in a military manual on the subject. I have to paraphrase here, because, again, I don't have the book with me.

So long as the guerrillas remain committed to fighting, it is next to impossible to defeat them as a movement. If handed a significant defeat, the guerrillas will just fall back, lick their wounds, re-arm, and recruit. The only truly effective way to counter a guerrilla campaign is to get the guerrillas to agree to stop fighting. To do this, the government must address the grievances that made them take up arms in the first place.

I don't know about you, but that part about not being able to defeat them really buried itself in my mind. The only way to end the fighting is to fix whatever has them willing to kill and/or die for.

The reason for this is simple: so long as ONE guerrilla remains alive and willing to fight, the war will go on. That one will recruit and train more. One determined individual becomes ten thousand armed combatants.

And govt. actions serve only to create more guerrillas. We don't need to look any further than our (the US and NATO) involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq to see that. A drone launches a missile at what the operator THINKS is a terrorist camp. A wedding reception gets blown up. The survivors, who may have been neutral before, now hate the side who sent the drone. We saw this in Vietnam, where VC were created by the actions of American forces and their South Vietnamese allies. When your only wealth is a water buffalo, and an air strike kills the water buffalo and destroys your rice paddy, the chances of you looking favorably upon the people that sent the plane are slim to none.

Government actions create guerrillas. By attempting to crack down on the guerrillas, the government becomes the best recruiter for them.

In my opinion, the Gender War is mostly at stage two to three, with some aspects of stage four. The MRAs are the closest thing we have to a conventional force, though they are still hopelessly outgunned by the forces of the femimarxists. PUAs are like the guerrillas doing ambushes, and MGTOW are like the guys destroying bridges, communication towers, and other infrastructure.

Every time the femimarxist forces achieve a victory (a man gets raped by a divorce, another anti-male law is passed), more guerrillas are created. They see our forces swelling, so they step up the pressure with more laws, more propaganda. But they only succeed in creating even MORE of us.

They can't beat us. So long as ONE man would rather GHOW, we won't be stopped. That one will open the eyes of another, maybe more. Those he unplugs from the Matrix will in turn liberate the minds of others. Until we're right back where we're at.

The place that my analogy falls apart is victory. If the guerrillas eventually win (and they almost always do), they typically either reconcile with the old regime or eradicate them. Either way, the people of the country in question get back to living their lives, and the country rebuilds.

In this war, for many there will be no reconciliation. Even if every law and policy that destroys men in favor of women were repealed tomorrow, even if female nature could be changed to eliminate vine-swinging, hypergamy, Briffault's Law, etc., there are great many men who would never go back to the plantation. They've seen marriage and relationshits for what they are, and want no part of it. They will continue their MGTOW Guerrilla campaign until the day they die.

More and more I find myself in this camp. No matter how the laws are changed, no matter how society's views and attitudes change, I don't want to ever get married again. That was, without a doubt, the worst mistake I ever made. Even if women were to do a total change, I'd still be basically enslaving myself to another person. No thank you.

Whether us holdouts are enough to make the whole idea useless is debatable. Personally I think it's mental masturbation, because unless someone can find a way to completely re-wire the female brain, the problems that have gotten us to this point will NEVER go away. Hypergamy will always exist. Women will always get 'bored' with their husbands and bang the biker gang down the way. They will never be satisfied with anything, and will continue to make the men around them miserable because THEY are miserable creatures.

And so The War will go on. If ever we get to the point that the femimarxists have been overthrown, they'll just do another thing common to guerrilla warfare: become the new guerrillas and continue the fight.

And we'll start the whole mess all over again.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hopefully I managed to keep those writings at least somewhat on-track. One of these days I'm going to have to actually do that whole 'rough draft' thing. The problem is, I've never done that unless forced to, by a teacher for example. I like to just let writing flow, and if I need to edit it I do so while writing.

My Bad

To anyone who's comments were deleted:

I won't attempt to accept comments on my phone anymore. Fucking phone....POS. I deleted on accident instead of accepting.

I truly dislike this phone. My old one was SO much better (but I don't have a contract now, so....meh).

This will be the last Samsung product I buy. Partly because I dislike it, and mostly because of their recent ad making men out to be some kind of stupidfuck cavemen who need a woman to help them through life.

If you commented on something recently, feel free to do so again. This time I won't use my phone.

No More Hate Among Red Pill Men

Just like everyone else on teh Interwebz, I have my favorite sites, but I also sometimes check out new things, depending on how much time I have on my hands.

Lately I've been browsing other Red Pill sites. And I have to say, I'm somewhat saddened by what I've read.

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to see that there are more and more men waking up every day. This is a good thing. The only way we have any hope of seeing the current system replaced is by opening the eyes of our Coppertop brothers.

No, what is disappointing is the amount of, well, HATE it seems like the various camps have for each other. This is, in my humble or not-so-humble opinion, stupid and destructive.

I've seen PUAs (PickUp Artists, for those that don't know) called pussybeggars who make things worse. MRAs (Men's Rights Activists) accused of being traitors. MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) called cowards or useless.

Guys, we can't, we abso-fucking-lutely CAN NOT allow this sort of thing to continue.

I've no doubt I've been guilty of it myself. Esp. when it comes to PUAs. The majority of them ARE pussybeggars, simply by virtue of the fact that they sacrifice and/or change damn near everything about themselves, put up a false front, and jump through a twats flaming hoops just to get a sniff of her gash. On the other end of the PUA spectrum are those that don't do that shit, they know how to game these sluts and use female psychology as a weapon. To these non-beggars I say good on ya, and I hope you see that I differentiate between the two.

As for MRAs, I think they're wasting their time. They try to use femimarxist tactics against the femimarxists, they try to REASON with the femimarxists (THAT isn't going to work), they want to reconcile with femimarxists and the State. They are basically, to my way of thinking, slaves asking for slightly lighter, prettier chains. I have no desire to reconcile shit, nor do I want chains of ANY kind. I don't care if the fuckers are made of donut dough and covered in chocolate, I don't want them on my neck.

Those are just my opinions, however, and I don't hate on either group (except the pussybeggars. Fuck those clowns). And that being said, I have good things to say about these groups also.

Every PUA is helping his partners reach The Wall that much sooner, and helping her develop a Thousand Cock Stare. Being pumped and dumped repeatedly can't be good for a slut's psyche or attitude, and messing with both of these decreases her chance of finding a husband sucker wallet to latch onto like the parasite she (most likely) is. I want all the non-pussybeggar PUAs to fuck as many sluts as possible. Use their psychology against them, get them to fall for you, then fucking CRUSH them.

MRAs give the enemy a visible target, something to focus waste their time and energy on. They get so caught up on fighting the MRAs, so over-the-top angry, so target-fixated that they develop tunnel vision (in a way) and the rest of us escape notice. I'm not a ghost, but a lot of the guys I talk to on forums are ghosting, and anything that draws femimarxist attention away from them can't be a bad thing, in my opinion.

MGTOW. Men Going Their Own Way. The name kind of says it all. I've seen at least one dumb slut say that "So-and-so is an MGTOW leader...how can you be Going Your Own Way if you have a leader?" If I recall correctly, she also had a few other moronic things to say.

Let's get something straight right now: MGTOW is not an organization like the MRM has. There are no 'leaders'. There are guys that have things they want to say, and have demonstrated intelligence in the past, so other guys listen to them. There are no organizations, no membership cards or lists, nothing.

We each live our life according to our own desires. We do things that benefit US, not some ungrateful whore like we were conditioned to do. We reject the life script that has been laid out for us by someone else. Like so many other things we've all had rammed down our throats all our lives, that life script is a big fat fucking LIE, and MGTOW want nothing to do with it.

Yeah, we (usually) don't get involved in your movement, MRAs, but we don't stand in the way, either. You do your thing, we'll do ours. I can't speak for every MGTOW (NO ONE can), but even though I think you're delusional, I offer you moral support if nothing else. When/if you ever decide your cause is useless and you get tired of fighting, I'll welcome you as an MGTOW, and if you're close enough or come by my way sometime, I"ll buy you a beer.

A lot of MGTOWs have no interest in dating, so you PUAs should be happy: those MGTOW who choose to ghost or otherwise have no interaction with women are removing themselves from the dating/fuckery pool, thus you have less competition. I'm not one of those ghosts, however. I just don't have the time or inclination to put up with the bullshit right now, and I'm in an unfamiliar place where I know no one, so I haven't felt like going out.

No matter if you agree with what I'm saying or not, you can, if you give it a second's worth of your biological processing unit's time and power, agree that we have the same enemies, and if we spend time and energy fighting each other, we inflict no pain on them. It's like Yugoslavian partisans of WWII fighting each other in addition to the Nazis.

Our enemies, as I see them, are femimarxists (and EVERY woman is a femimarxist, if she'll just be honest with herself and the world), manginas, and, most especially, white knights.

Oh gods how I fucking hate white knights. Traitorous fucks. These fucking faggots are the worst scum of the lot. And they come in all shapes, sizes, professions, etc. From the douchebag frat boy who wants to fight a guy who ARGUES, not beats just ARGUES, with a twat, to the politico who passes laws that benefit only twats, to the scumbag judge who awards vagimony and child custody to twats just on general principle, to the cops who fucking KNOW the truth about domestic violence but continue to "just do my job" and "I only enforce the law, I don't write it" rather than standing up and calling bullshit, white knights are fucking EVERYWHERE and they're fucking other men over.

MGTOW, PUA, MRA....if we're not going to work together, then we at least need to not be enemies. We have more than enough enemies already, and if we sabotage each other then we are guaranteed to never see any kind of positive change. Positive, of course, being entirely dependent on your own point of view.

If you're an MRA and someone you know, or talk to online, or whatever, asks about PUA or MGTOW, DO NOT talk shit on them. Encourage them to explore these other options. That's what MEN do, explore, question, etc.

If you're PUA and someone seems to be bordering on MGTOW, don't call him a 'beta' and say that MGTOW are just losers who can't get laid. A lot of us get laid, and the others are voluntarily celibate. A man's worth is NOT dependent upon how many sluts he has bedded. Also, stop with this Greek bullshit. I may write another post about that sometime, but for now, I'll leave it at this:

We are MEN. We are human beings, not Greek letters. We are individuals, not ants. We are not pigeons, don't try to put us in a hole. Everyone is different, and everyone has potential to be more than what they currently are.

As for MGTOW, most of us are pretty laissez faire about how other men choose to live their lives. Yes, there are some that advocate "GHOST! GHOST! GHOST! GHOST!" to the exclusion of anything else. I believe they understand that for some of us, ghosting will quite likely NEVER be an option, for whatever reason. I think the most important thing we, MGTOW, can do in this matter is to stop with the shit-talking about MRAs and non-pussybeggar PUAs (the pussybeggars are not Men, just simps, however, so fuck them, say what you will).

Each of us has a part to play, I guess you could put it. It's up to the individual to determine which road is the correct one for him. There is no One Right Answer in this. Seek. Discover. That's what men do.

Regardless of which way you go, I wish you the best with whatever you choose, and sincerely hope that you one day find the path that's right for you.

BOLO

Holy damn am I tired. The past 4 days I've totaled probably 58 hours at work, and I get to work BOTH my days off. I'm so tired right now I'm not even going to play Battlefield 3. Haven't played all week.

Have some ideas floating around in my head for "Make you think" type posts. So Be On the Look Out for those soon.

The good thing about all this overtime is, I can get caught up on a couple more bills from the mountain of debt that my psychotic ex left me under. And the sooner I get caught up on some of them, the sooner I can get more tattoos.

I has a happy.

Captain Capitalism's blog

One of the blogs I discovered recently is Captain Capitalism. A lot of good reading there, especially if you are interested in economics (which I am...I really liked it in college, even though it was one of those 'filler' classes for engineering).

I don't always agree with everything he says (I STRONGLY disagree with the post about "The 80/20 Rule", because he believes in NAWALT and I don't), but he's intelligent and strikes me as VERY Libertarian, both of which I respect.

I'm also reading, and enjoying, his book, "Enjoy the Decline". If you haven't bought a copy, I suggest you consider doing so. 

Disclaimer: I am in no way affiliated with Captain Capitalism, nor am I getting any kind of kickbacks or anything for linking to his blog or plugging his book. I simply enjoy reading what he writes and watching the few videos I've watched thus far.

Experimenting with a new look

I decided to change things up a little bit. This SHOULD make it easier to find older posts, as well as links that I want to share. Not that there are a lot of posts yet, but maybe someday...haha. Also, having a Links (zwo drei vier) section means not having to wade through ALL the posts for a link you want.

I'm such a considerate guy, right?

Yes, well, it also makes it easier for me to see what I've already shared.

So, what do you think of the new look?

The True Nature Of Women

In case you haven't already come across this in your surfing of teh Interwebz, I offer the following article:

The True Nature of Women

A great read. One of the things I like the most about it, besides its content, is the source. If you don't know who Roosh is, Google him and the results will explain for themselves. If you DO, then I really don't need to explain.

I wonder if all the pussybegging mangina/white knight simp PUAs are now going to launch shaming attacks on him? He is (was?) one of their idols, and even HE is changing his tune lately.

As the poster "ubermensch" said on my favorite forum, "We are witnessing, in real time, the fall of a culture and society."

Agreed, brother.

Shaming Article - What If Men Stopped Chasing Much-Younger Women?

The author of the piece of garbage in question is...well, NOTHING, basically. He's a mangina through and through. A male feminist. Basically, he's a traitor. But the article was shared for ripping apart at my favorite forum, and I took part in said ripping. I'm not going to post the entire article here, just a bunch of quotes and the web address for this particular piece of trash from the scumpouch Hugo.

A warning to the TL;DR crowd: this post is going to be long. Very, very long. 

==============

"If there's one tangible thing that men can do to help end sexism—and create a healthier culture in which young people come of age—it's to stop chasing after women young enough to be their biological daughters. As hyperbolic as it may sound, there are few more powerful actions that men can take to transform the culture than to date, mate, and stay with their approximate chronological peers. If aging guys would commit to doing this, everyone would benefit: older men and younger men, older women and younger women."

I fail to see a) how dating someone younger is sexism, b) why on Earth it is the responsibility of men to end sexism, c) why men would even WANT to, and d) how your proposed 'solution' is even relevant to the issue (whatever that may be).

Let's look at a) through d) point-by-point.

A) People dating and/or marrying whosoever they choose is only sexism if one goes by the definition put forth by feminists/liberals/other assorted Marxists. Which, conveniently, amounts to 'anything that any woman, anywhere, can get offended about'. Since people dating whoever they want to, rather than who someone else thinks they should, is a great example of the free market at work, I can see why Marxists would be against it. After all, free markets encourage competition. People will better themselves to attract a mate that meets their expectations for attractiveness, personality, etc. And men in their 30s, 40s, or beyond are free to choose women in their 20s. Marxists absolutely HATE anyone being able to make their own choices, rather than the Marxists making choices for them.

B) It's sexism when some woman, somewhere gets offended, chivalry when a woman likes it; dominance when a man takes charge and she likes it, sexism when she doesn't. It can be the same action each time. Let's say I hold a door open for a woman who's juggling three bags of groceries and a screaming toddler. Some women will be grateful, others indignant. Same action, different results. The problem most assuredly is NOT on MY end, but rather that of the female. It's not MY responsibility to adjust my actions to her mood; rather, it is HER responsibility to see my actions for what they are, a polite gesture.

C) Tell me again why I, or any other man, should care? A war has been waged against us for decades, destroying everything that is us. Masculinity is shamed, fathers have been sent to the Spares Bin, the court system is severely weighted AGAINST us IN FAVOR OF women, in pretty much every aspect you care to name but especially when it comes to divorce and child custody. So why in the gods' names would we want to do ANYTHING that can allegedly make things better for women? Only a thirsty simp, sniveling mangina, or scumpouch white knight would want such a thing.

D) "Men dating younger women is sexism and needs to stop".....That's the best you could come up with? REALLY???!?!?? And people PAY you to write this tripe? I sincerely hope you're getting paid by the word, and not by how much sense or relevance your 'articles' contain. But I'll play along for a few minutes. Suppose that men in their 30s and above were to decide tomorrow to only date women within 3 years of their own age. How is that going to solve 'sexism'? If I wife up a 32 year old woman, will that suddenly make me immune to being raped in divorce court, and having any theoretical children we might have stolen from me? Will putting a ring on a woman that hit the wall 10 years ago keep me from having to pay vagimony when she pulls the eject lever? Does enslaving myself to a twice-divorced mother of four who graduated high school in 1986 magically mean that I'll have a wife that actually treats me like a person, and respects me for ME, rather than disrespecting me, treating me like a slave, and considering me nothing more than a walking ATM and her Alternate Retirement Plan?

"This proposal flies in the face of everything we're taught is normal and inevitable. Take the case of Johnny Depp, who turns 50 next month. His new girlfriend, actress Amber Heard, just turned 27. Described as acting like a "besotted teenager," the thoroughly middle-aged Depp is reportedly eager to start a new family with Heard, who wasn't yet born when he made his film debut in 1984's Nightmare on Elm Street. Last year, Depp separated from his long-time girlfriend (and mother of his two childen) Vanessa Paradis, shortly before she turned 40."

How about we DON'T take the case of Johnny Depp? I know that you are leaving out a lot of information. Critical information. He didn't just wake up one day, realize he was married to a post-Wall hag who sags everywhere that attractive women DON'T, and decide to divorce her. Very, VERY few men do this, and those who have the kind of money he has are much less likely to do so. Divorce is expensive because it's worth it, but it's even MORE expensive for men like Mr. Depp.

"Ours, as Buchanan documented, is a culture which represents men's sexual desirability as being as enduring as women's is fleeting."

"Men age like fine wine; women age like milk."

Our culture doesn't represent "men's sexual desirability as being as enduring as women's is fleeting"...that's just the way it is. On average, a man will be more attractive in his 30's than he was in his late teens. He'll also have several other traits women look for, such as financial stability.

"It's certainly not just graying celebrities like Depp who rob the cradle."

'Rob the cradle'? Newsflash, boyo: your shaming won't work on me, or anyone else who lets logic and reason guide them through life. Simps, manginas, and white knights may respond, but who really cares what they think anyway?

"Research on the preferences of users of OK Cupid, one of America's most popular dating sites, indicates that 'men show a decided preference for younger women, especially as the men get older... so, even though men and women are more-or-less proportionately represented on the site, men's decided preference for younger women makes for many fewer potential dates for women'.
 
Um, no.....If there are X number of men, and Y number of women, then the number of potential dates for women is X. Only if X decreases are there fewer potential dates for women. You really should have thrown some kind of qualifier in there, such as "fewer potential dates for women WHO ARE 30 OR OLDER". Have I mentioned my disbelief that you could possibly get paid to write? That was a very simple logic and math exercise. And you failed. Miserably.

"According to that tale, heterosexual men who have the sexual or financial cachet to do so almost invariably leave the partners who aren't young enough to be their daughters for the women who are."

Generally it's not 'leaving' the older women, it's 'not getting involved with them in the first place'. Huge difference. My gods, did you really pass high school level English classes?

"In the popular imagination, men do this because they can—and because they're presumably answering the call of evolutionary and biological imperatives that push them irresistibly towards younger women."

No imagination to it; again, it's fact. In cases like Depp, it's made even easier by No-Fault divorce laws (which feminists were so adamant about wanting). And there's no 'presumably', either. Biology is a powerful thing. Even more powerful than the feminists who have tried for decades to rewire people to ignore biology. News flash: it doesn't work that way, and it can't work that way. And as a species we'd better hope and pray that it NEVER works.

Younger females are more fertile and less prone to giving birth to babies with defects, having a miscarriage, or any of the probably hundreds of things that can go wrong with the pregnancy process. Plain and simple, cut and dried. I suspect most men are like me, in that if I'm looking for a mother for my children, I want one that's going to have the best chance of giving birth to a live, perfectly healthy child, as well as her surviving the ordeal and being able to do it again at some point. I most definitely do NOT want a woman who's pregnancy can best be described as 'dicey', and who's age will put the chance of birth defects somewhere above 50%.

"What seems harmless and natural, however, is neither. A culture in which older men value younger women more than their own female peers does damage to everyone.
.....
This is about the way in which young women come of age surrounded by reminders that they are at their most desirable when they are still at their most uncertain and insecure. Some young women are attracted to older men (for a host of possible reasons), but even these find too many men who are, in the end, deeply unsafe."

And you're qualified to make these statements HOW, exactly? I'm not talking about the one relating to female desirability; you're spot-on with that. Women ARE at their peak in their early 20s. I wouldn't go so far as to say that they're at their most uncertain and insecure at that time. I'd probably put that period at 11-13. By the time a woman hits her 20s, she's generally been riding the Cock Carousel for six years (sometimes more). She's had over a dozen partners, if not several score. She's been indoctrinated by feminist propaganda for two entire decades. She's developed an entitled, bitchy attitude. And, most importantly, she hasn't had The Wall re-introduce reality into her life. She's still able to get by on her looks alone, instead of having to work to support herself (you know, like MEN have to do), nor see the big THREE-OH looming and realize that she's still single. No, she's definitely not at her most uncertain and insecure.

"It's not just women who lose out as a consequence of this fixation on the older man, younger woman ideal. Ask women in their teens and 20s who are in relationships with older men about guys their own age, and you'll invariably hear laments about young men's immaturity. That callowness is often oversold by too many aging Lotharios wanting to emphasize the difference between their own supposed expertise and young men's clumsiness. The reality is that just as many young women "grow up too quickly" as a result of older men's attention, many young men grow up too slowly because of a lack of it. If men over 40 spent half as much time mentoring guys under 30 as they do chasing women in that age bracket, more young men might prove excellent partners to their female peers."

There is so much fail here, I'm not certain where to start.

Women are primarily attracted to two things: money and power. It doesn't have to be the kind of power to send an army to smash a country, though that certainly helps. Nor does it have to be Texas Oil Tycoon levels of wealth, though there isn't a woman alive who wouldn't spread her legs for a man who is sufficiently rich enough.

A man who's 10 years older than his prospective partner has life experience that younger men don't (and not JUST in the bedroom), and also tends to be more secure financially than men the same age as the woman in question. Even after going through a divorce and being buried under a mountain of debt, there are very few 18 year olds who can compete with me when it comes to having discretionary cash. I don't have to worry about whether I can afford to take a woman out for dinner. I don't have to choose between date night and making my car payment. And yes, I'm much better in the bedroom than I was at 19. Much. Better.

Why would I 'mentor' guys under 30? Let's assume for a second that I was just like all the Coppertops out there (a thirsty simp); I'm directly competing with approximately 49% of the population when it comes to getting the girl. If you were playing football, would you stop running for the end zone and hand the ball to the other team? I realize you've probably never played a sport in your life, but try using your imagination for a second. The point of a sport is to WIN. In this 'sport' (pussyhound), the point is to bed females. Unless the female in question isn't one that I want, I'll be competing with, quite literally, thousands of other males. Some of them WILL have me beat in the Appearance department. Why in the gods names should I give them even more of an advantage?

"Many people who concede that older men's obsession with younger women is disillusioning and destabilizing insist that the sexual choices of men like Johnny Depp are driven by natural imperatives. That's not quite what the science shows. Research on age disparate relationships does find a biological case for older men choosing slightly younger women; a 2007 study of 11,000 Swedes found that the most fecund men were those with partners six years younger than themselves. The strategic reproductive benefit of choosing a younger woman diminished as the age gap widened. According to the science, Depp was better matched with Paradis (nine years his junior) than with the new girlfriend."

Another paragraph that's bursting with FAIL...

First off, I wouldn't trust ANYTHING that came from Sweden. NO-THING. This is a country whose feminists (read: women) have so thoroughly destroyed the society that they had to pass laws to keep their men from marrying foreign women. Ouch, there's that whole 'free market' thing that Marxists hate so much.

Second, eleven thousand SOUNDS like an impressive number, until you realize that it's only 5500 couples. AND nothing was mentioned about their ages. For all we (the people reading the garbage you wrote) know, the females could all be under 24 and the men could all be in the 28-34 age range. In which case, the point you're trying to make would have been basically disproven.

"So if older men aren't pursuing much younger women because of evolutionary hardwiring, why do they? It's hard not to conclude that much of the appeal is about the hope of finding someone less demanding. A man in his 40s who wants to date women in their 20s is making the same calculation as the man who pursues a "mail-order bride" from a country with less egalitarian values. It's about the mistaken assumption that younger women will be more malleable. Men who chase younger women aren't eroticizing firmer flesh as much as they are a pre-feminist fantasy of a partner who is endlessly starry-eyed and appreciative. The dead giveaway comes when you ask middle-aged men why they prefer to date younger; almost invariably, you'll hear complaints that their female peers are too entitled, too embittered, too feminist."

"Even a blind squirrel finds a nut eventually". You are the proverbial blind squirrel.

Post-Wall women have a gigantic chip on their shoulder to go with their terrible entitlement attitudes. In a sane society there would be a bounty on them.

The desire isn't for a woman who's 'malleable', it's for one who's not cruel, hateful, mean, spiteful, conceited, and entitled....you know, everything that a post-Wall woman IS.

I would say that feminism really screwed up a lot of women, but the theory I've heard is that feminism just removed the mask that women wore. I think that's accurate. I think that, in most regards, they were just as bad all throughout history, it's just that they don't make any effort to hide it anymore. And all the societal controls on the worst attitudes and behaviors of women have been removed, thanks to feminism. AND the very things that make men MEN have been destroyed, again thanks to feminism.

"One of the basic rules of tennis applies here: If you want to improve your skills, you need to play someone who is (at a minimum) at your own level. As sophisticated as a 20-something may be, she will be more so—with a more exquisite bullshit detector—in her 40s."

I don't play tennis. That is a game for queers and women.

In her 40s she will also have a MUCH worse attitude, a whole host of wrinkles (or have had cosmetic surgery or botox to alleviate them), her best parts will sag, and she will most likely have a couple of thugspawn from her years of riding the Cock Carousel. I made the mistake of getting involved with an older woman with kids before; it's not a mistake I will repeat.

"When older men date much younger women, they cheat themselves out of an opportunity to be matched with a partner with the maturity to see them as they really are."

I think what you meant was "see them as an alternate retirement plan, father-figure for their illegitimate thugspawn, or walking ATM". Shall I fix that for you? I should be getting a cut of your pay for writing this garbage, if I'm going to be fixing things for you.

"Depression, the research shows, peaks for men in their mid-to-late 40s."

I wonder if it's just a coincidence that this is also right around the time when most men are experiencing the joy of having their wife pull the eject lever on their marriage?

"If the older man/younger woman dynamic is less "natural" and more destructive than we imagined, how then to respond to couples that make that dynamic work?"

Oh, that's simple. DON'T. Leave them alone. Stop thinking that everyone has to conform to YOUR ideas about what's right and proper.

"It's like attending the wedding of a couple that gets together as the result of an affair: One can wish them every happiness without endorsing what led them there."

No. No, it's not. It's an entirely different animal altogether.

There's nothing wrong with people dating whoever they choose, regardless of the age differences involved. It's perfectly natural for men in their 30s and later to want attractive, fertile women who will birth healthy offspring.

A wedding of a couple that gets together as the result of an affair is an affront to the intelligence of pretty much anyone who isn't a slobbering liberal/feminist/Marxist. I have a sense of decency, therefor I will NOT wish them happiness. I will wish the cheater to get karmic justice.

"I'm not proposing that we shame every age-disparate couple."

Um, actually, that's EXACTLY what you're doing. 'Rob the cradle' sound familiar? As well as all the rest of the hogwash you spewed. It was just one big, long Shame Train.

"I am proposing that we challenge heterosexual middle-aged men to direct their sexual and romantic energies to their female peers."

Why? What possible reason would a man in his 30s have to be with a woman who has all the baggage that women in that age bracket have?

Also, while we're on the topic of challenge.....have you any idea what a challenge it is to get with a female in her early to mid 20s? If she's even halfway attractive, she has many, MANY options when it comes to men. And just because I'm better looking than I was at 21, and more financially stable, AND more worldly, doesn't mean I have an automatic "in" with these women. I'm competing with guys who have known her her entire life....went to school with her since kindergarten....I, on the other hand, have to break the ice and build some kind of rapport. That's a lot harder. I have yet to walk up to a 22 year old, show her my driver's license (age verification) and my pay stub, and bed her immediately.

Personally, I prefer Free Market Dating over having some chucklehead like you tell me who I should date and why. I'll date who I'm attracted to, plain and simple, cut and dried. If that means competing with men 15 years younger than me, so be it. Unlike my female age-peers, I have a lot going for me. If a woman can't see that, that is HER problem.
=============

In case you want to read the entire load of rubbish, here's where you can find it. As always you'll need to replace the X's.

Alternately, perhaps you want to go have fun with the comments section. In which case I say:

Give 'em hell boys!

hXXp://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/05/what-if-men-stopped-chasing-much-younger-women/275916/

*IF* I did hate women, this would be part of why

Any guy that doesn't pedestalize the pussy and spend every moment of their life trying to either bed the next woman or please the one they have is accused of hating women. I've been accused of it. I don't HATE them, I just realize the danger they pose and refuse to allow myself to be fucked over by one again. And let's face it, hate is a strong emotion and requires energy. It gives wymmin attention, which is a form of validation. They want ANY form of attention from men, even hate. The hamster works in strange ways, my friends.

But I found a good reason the other day to hate them, if I were inclined to do so.

I don't truly have a home right now. I have a place where most of my stuff is, and places that I crash on my days off, and where I stay when I'm working. The first two are on the other side of the state from the latter, and Montana is a big state.

After work on Friday I was on my way to my friend's place to crash there for the weekend, and stopped in Billings to pick up a few things and grab some food. I phoned in an order to Old Chicago Pizza (excellent pizza, btw), then went to pick it up after I finished getting a few things at the store I was in. As is typical, the pizza wasn't done yet, so I had a seat on the bench and waited, surfing MGTOW Forum and Fakebook while I waited.

A few minutes into my wait, a man and his son left. The kid was a little ahead, running along and saying hi and waving to everyone. Your typical friendly little kid. He smiled and said hi, and without thinking about the fact that I was talking to a child who was probably under 3 years old, I replied in my usual manner.

Me: Hey, how ya doin?

Kid: I'm good.

It was at this point that a little bit of the ice fell away from my cold, black heart. And at the same time, I died inside a little more.

I would very much like to have a son. Several, actually. I think I'd be a great father. I'd love to teach my boys how to hunt, fish, and shoot, go swimming, boating, floating, skiing, etc. with them, climb trees or rocks, help them learn trigonometry and physics, maybe play some hockey, all the good stuff dads get to do with their sons, or watch their sons do (school plays and the like).

But that will never happen. And it is 100% because of women.

Unplugging from the Matrix doesn't necessarily mean that one hates females. It just means you recognize the dangers they pose, and no longer consider cupcake to be some kind of perfect, special little snowflake. You know better.

I won't have any kids because I know the risks involved in having any kind of relationshit with women. I know that the chances are overwhelming that she'll bang some thug the minute she's out of sight. I know she's likely to get knocked up by said thug and try to make me think the kid is mine. I know that even if she doesn't cheat (and 90% of married women DO), she can pull the eject lever at any time and strip me of everything that matters. AND she'd be able to use the full weight and power of Big Daddy Government to do it, too. I could lose my home, my retirement (AGAIN!), all my possessions (AGAIN!), and be forced to pay her every month. And worst of all, she could keep me from seeing the sons that are the only reason I'd want to get involved with her in the first place, again with the full support of Big Daddy Government.

Women have made it so that only the stupid and naive will get involved with them for longer than it takes to Pump & Dump. And I am neither naive or stupid. So my genetic line dies with me.

And THAT, my friends, is as good of a reason to hate women as any.

And I still don't hate them.

More Wisdom from Vic

As you've probably noticed by now, I re-post the writings of members of the forums I go to sometimes. This is one of those times. Vic made an excellent post here, and I think it deserves to be read by those who read this page but not the forum it originated at. It's short but well worth your time.
 =============================================================

I woke up in the middle of the night with this list in my head.

As God is my witness I could still hear a voice repeating this when I awoke. I need more sleep!


1. Do you know why women are involved in over 60% of child abuse cases? Because they’re nurturing.

2. Do you know why women are as likely to initiate domestic violence as men? Because they’re not violent.

3. Do you know why women initiate 70% of divorces? Because they’re not afraid of commitment.

4. Do you know why women steal men’s assets and kidnap their children? Because they’re moral.

5. Do you know why women put men in jail for the inability to pay child support when they lose their job? Because they’re compassionate and caring.

6. Do you know why women openly laugh when a man is tortured to death by having his penis amputated with a butcher’s knife? Because they’re naturally empathetic and have a good sense of humor.

7. Do you know why women steal their legless husband’s rehabilitation money when they come back from fighting a war? Because they’re kind and value relationships.

8. Do you know why women demand their husbands work themselves into an early grave so they can have a new car and kitchen remodel? Because they love God and value family.

9. Do you know why women demand special treatment and compensation from the companies they work for, the men they meet and the government they vote for? Because they’re independent and don’t need men.

10. Do you know why women sleep with entire football teams? Because they value monogamy.

You know why men shouldn’t marry?

Because signing a contract that can be unilaterally dissolved by a disgruntled partner, for any reason, so they can steal his house, his money, his children and his liberty, is not only irresponsible, it’s taking the liberty that God gave him and wiping his ass with it.

To sign a contract that abandons your liberty to a violent government is not just unconscionable; it’s an act of suicide and an act of disrespect to the people who care about you.

To execute a contract that no attorney would have you sign, even if the consequences you were dealing with what amounted to losing the trash in your garage is, to say the least, spitting on the gift of your God given liberty because of the irrational belief that YOU are a special cupcake that can avoid the live grenade.

To live in defiance of the undeniable is to die under the weight of undeniable consequences.


Where are all the good men?

They’ve already witnessed a lifetime of points 1 through 10.

Burn it.

Online ramblings of a moron: "Why Do Men 'Hate' Females?"

Let me begin by saying, I don't do Reddit. Or Twitter. Or any of the sites similar to them. Hell, it was the last few months of 2011 before I joined Facebook, and then only because a) friends that I rarely got to see were on there and it was a good way to stay in touch, and b) a girl I wanted to bang was on there (I met her at a friend's place). So I don't go searching thru Reddit looking for things to write about, or even read.

One of the guys on the main forum I visit posted an article from Reddit, written by a woman (OF COURSE!), entitled"Why Do Men 'Hate' Females?". I'm not going to re-post it here; it's really a load of hogwash, and I don't feel like insulting my readers' intelligence with it, nor adding a lump of text that could best be covered with "tl;dr, here's the summary". Nor will I post an active link. You'll have to put the t's in http yourself. I would prefer there not being anything leading the...eh....'readers'....there to this page.

hxxp://np.reddit.com/r/fPUA/comments/1e9fz1/attracting_alphas_why_do_men_hate_us/

First off, she's made a couple of mistakes right from the get-go. "Attracting alphas"....she just admitted what those of us no longer in the Matrix, as well as PUAs, already know: unless you're a bad-boy thug, you can forget women until they're looking for a fat wallet to attach themselves to. Also, she assumes that we (men) hate women.

Obviously I can only speak for myself, but I can say honestly and without a doubt that I do not hate women. I have been accused of it, but those accusations have come from men so deeply embedded in the Matrix that they'll likely never get out. The opinions of Coppertops don't matter to me. I would imagine many women would make the same accusation, but again, their opinions don't matter to me either.

If I believed in NAWALT, I would like to have an attractive, intelligent NAWALT in my life. But I've reached the point where my belief in NAWALT is almost zero, and decreasing by the day. It's only a matter of time until any woman that seems NAWALT turns AWALT.

Hate? No. Apathy? Yes. Disgust? Disappointment? Resignation? Yes, yes, and yes. Just because I understand the nature and psychology of women, and recognize the dangers they pose to a man, doesn't mean I hate them. To me, that's like hating a dog for chasing rabbits. It's just how/what they are, you can't hate them for it.

After her initial mistakes, the author goes on to list a bunch of things that sound good, but in reality all she's doing is encouraging women to be even more manipulative and deceitful. I will give her props for several things, though: this one realizes that the problem is with WOMEN, not men (unlike the authors of all the "Where Have All the Good Men Gone?" articles), and she knows what lies at the very root of the problem. Unfortunately, she misses the mark by a pretty wide margin. Not only with the bit about "Lie your ass off by pretending to be what he wants", but also attributing false causes to male behavior. Men don't talk about the kind of things you'll read in the Manosphere in real life because talking about anything that doesn't conform to societal norms (Be a good little slave, man up and marry that used-up party girl slut, let her take you to the cleaners in the divorce, spend the rest of your life in slavery due to vagimony and child support, etc.) is a good way to, at the very least, lose your job.

I am fair, however, so I will give her points for at least recognizing some of the problems that are causing men to just say Fuck It to marriage and relationshits. But her solution is pure, unadulterated evil. Yes, we want a woman that actually gives a damn about us as something other than a walking ATM, emotional tampon, and sperm bank. But we want one that's genuine. Faking it is, in my opinion (and I'm sure plenty of other guys will agree with me), even worse than being everything that's bad/undesirable about modern women. "Better an honest enemy than a traitorous friend" and all that.

Another good reason to never cohabitate with a woman

Today I received links to a couple of stories that I'm going to share with you all. In case anyone reading this isn't entirely convinced that it's a bad idea to cohabitate (live with) a woman, even if you're not married, maybe this will help you out.

The first link

The second link

Yes, the second one is 5 years old. I had never seen it before. Heck, it was only recently that I'd even HEARD OF anything like this before.

If you're one of those guys who won't click on links, or you're reading this on a phone that is a pain to open multiple windows with, I'll sum it up.

You don't have to knock up a woman, or even marry her, for her to be able to get the court to loot you. Just living with one is enough. Vagimony for an ex-girlfriend who simply tells a sympathetic judge that you had a verbal agreement to support her even if the two of you broke up.

Insanity!

I'd heard about this kind of thing in Canada (where the .gov considers people who live together for 2 years or longer to be married) and Australia (where ex-mistresses and ex-girlfriends can take half of your stuff and half of your retirement), but this is the first I've heard of it in the US.

I would say "I have no words", but the fact is I do. I have a lot. How many of them are fit to print, OTOH, is a different story altogether.

I wish I could say that I'm surprised by this, but the fact is, I'm not.

Anyone still have doubts as to whether the system and women collaborate to loot men of anything and everything?

Does feminism actually encourage women to be lesbians until they start riding the cock carousel?

Yet another post inspired by a forum...

This time, someone posted a link from the NY Post about teenage girls creating moist spots in their panties over the suspect in the bombing at the Boston Marathon.

I'm going to be my usual straightforward self on this:

He looks like a bitch. It wouldn't surprise me if he wore girl pants and had a girl belt with all kinds of sparklies on it.

And these dumb little twats are going completely ape over him.

I'm reminded of the oldest stepmonster, before she turned into a total whore (at least, I'm pretty sure it was before that). She was the same way: she thought guys that wore girl pants, mascara, etc., were HAWT. She wasn't the only one her age, in the area, that was attracted to this type of 'guy', just the only one who lived in my house. Now I see this story that there are far too many (I don't know how many, nor do I give a shit) girls saying that the bombing suspect is HAWT.

It's a pretty common theme, girls thinking that effeminate males are 'hawt'. Sure, there are still the football sluts, and the sluts for musicians, and the regular old slut sluts, but it seems like the number of sluts being sluts for guys that look like girls has increased drastically.

Unless maybe they're not fucking them? I don't know. The stepmonster started out as a slut for musicians, then just went slut slut. She'd fuck anything with a hard dick, as long as he was dirty and didn't have a job or much chance at a future that didn't involve couch surfing at friends' homes or living in his car. Last time I saw her, she hadn't gotten over the effeminate male kick, though.

Thanks to the red pill, I understand a lot more about the nature of women. But I can't for the life of me remember anything about them being attracted to bitchmales. Thug cock, yes. Weaklings that they can sponge resources off of while fucking the thugs, yes. Males that look like females....not so much.

Are they all, deep down, lesbians until they start riding the cock carousel hard? Is that perhaps why the younger females really go for the creeps that wear girl pants?

If so, is this another thing we can lay squarely at the feet of feminism? Prior to feminism, a guy that wore girl pants and mascara would have gotten the shit kicked out of him. Right or wrong, that's just the way it was. If he didn't, he sure as hell wouldn't have had girls lined up by the hundreds to let him sniff their wet panties.

And yet, this bitchmale (who is accused of murdering several people, let's not forget) has them flocking to him for that very reason. He looks like he has a mop on his head, and he's got a weak, feminine face, and there are thousands of dumb twats who would throw themselves at him if they could.

It would be easy to say that it's because he's a criminal and women are fundamentally stupid, and that's why they're doing it. He's not a criminal until he's convicted, remember, though sadly I think we all know how this is going to turn out. "Fair trial" my ass, he's already been convicted, all that's left is Kangaroo Kourt and sentencing. Back on point, though, even if he wasn't a criminal, even if evidence had turned up that showed he was innocent of everything except overstaying a visa, and he was being held until he could be deported, I think we'd STILL see this kind of campaign from these dumb twats, simply because he's "hawt".

Since I don't make a habit of studying feminism, I don't know if it's minions are actively trying to get women to become fishmongers, but I DO think that all this "Girl don't need no man", "Girl you can do anything you want", "You GO grrrll!" and "Grrl pwrrr!" bullshit is having exactly that effect. Young females, who are even more impressionable than their older counterparts (and THAT is really saying something) hear these bullshit words, and maybe they're getting it in their heads that female traits and appearance are the ONLY traits and appearance that are desirable. Thus we see them thinking effeminate males are 'hawt'. Of course, after their hormones start really raging, they climb on the cock carousel and fuck any thug that comes along, but until they're into their ride, they go for bitchmales like the bombing suspect and all the dirty, girl pants-wearing, makeup-caking, pathetic excuse for a male dirtbags that the stepmonster used to "date".

Sometimes I'm really, really glad to be in my 30's. I'm really looking forward to that decreased libido that's supposed to happen any day now. It will be wonderful to not have ANY need or desire for women. Pretty much every day there's something else, something like the story in the Post, that proves once again everything I've learned about female nature and psychology over the last few months.

How many of us are looking forward to the invention of artificial wombs, and the Japanese perfecting their sex robots? My hand is in the air on that one. Those two inventions will spell the beginning of the end of human females. And neither of them can come soon enough.